<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL Week 10:  The Duke&#8217;s Picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcpsports.com/2008/11/07/nfl-week-10-the-dukes-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcpsports.com/2008/11/07/nfl-week-10-the-dukes-picks/</link>
	<description>There's more than one side to every sports story...what's yours?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael DeLuca</title>
		<link>http://pcpsports.com/2008/11/07/nfl-week-10-the-dukes-picks/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael DeLuca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcpsports.wordpress.com/?p=2489#comment-1028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, the four points is what grabbed me.  I can see it being a nailbiting field goal game.  

Pittsburgh got my highest weight, followed by Kansas City.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the four points is what grabbed me.  I can see it being a nailbiting field goal game.  </p>
<p>Pittsburgh got my highest weight, followed by Kansas City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Peters</title>
		<link>http://pcpsports.com/2008/11/07/nfl-week-10-the-dukes-picks/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Peters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcpsports.wordpress.com/?p=2489#comment-1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is the one I would give the lowest weight. I&#039;m not sure what I&#039;d do on the Buffalo one. I don&#039;t like Buffalo on the road against a division team, but I don&#039;t know if the Pats can put up touchdowns. The Bills secondary is banged up and their lines (both offensive and defensive) were bitchslapped by the Jets last week.

I&#039;d make that the second lowest weight, but I&#039;m inclined to go with the Pats on that one. I wish the line were a little lower.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the one I would give the lowest weight. I&#8217;m not sure what I&#8217;d do on the Buffalo one. I don&#8217;t like Buffalo on the road against a division team, but I don&#8217;t know if the Pats can put up touchdowns. The Bills secondary is banged up and their lines (both offensive and defensive) were bitchslapped by the Jets last week.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d make that the second lowest weight, but I&#8217;m inclined to go with the Pats on that one. I wish the line were a little lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael DeLuca</title>
		<link>http://pcpsports.com/2008/11/07/nfl-week-10-the-dukes-picks/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael DeLuca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcpsports.wordpress.com/?p=2489#comment-1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tom

I&#039;m in a pool where I have to pick seven games a week and give them each a weight.  I did give Oakland the lowest.  

I actually posted my picks a little earlier than usual, hoping I could get your thoughts before I had to submit the picks.  You&#039;ve been pretty good at picking out my stinkers, so I figured I&#039;d give the ones you didn&#039;t like the lowest weight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in a pool where I have to pick seven games a week and give them each a weight.  I did give Oakland the lowest.  </p>
<p>I actually posted my picks a little earlier than usual, hoping I could get your thoughts before I had to submit the picks.  You&#8217;ve been pretty good at picking out my stinkers, so I figured I&#8217;d give the ones you didn&#8217;t like the lowest weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Peters</title>
		<link>http://pcpsports.com/2008/11/07/nfl-week-10-the-dukes-picks/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Peters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcpsports.wordpress.com/?p=2489#comment-1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m inclined to agree with you on most your picks, but I think Carolina will cover. You are giving the Raiders way too much credit. How are they going to move the ball enough to stay within striking distance of Carolina.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m inclined to agree with you on most your picks, but I think Carolina will cover. You are giving the Raiders way too much credit. How are they going to move the ball enough to stay within striking distance of Carolina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

